T&T Securities and Exchange Commission

IN THIS week’s article, the respective roles of the regulator and registrants in ensuring compliance with Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism (AML/ CFT) requirements will be discussed. The registrant plays an important role in ensuring that AML/CFT measures adopted in the market are robust and in this regard, the function of the Compliance Officer (CO) within registrant companies is of paramount importance and will be the specific area of focus.

The regulator

The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) Standards and Recommendations are the global benchmark for assessing the strength and effectiveness of a country’s AML/CFT regime. A key element of FATF’s Recommendations 2012, is the application of a risk-based approach to AML/CFT supervision. Under the risk-based approach, countries and financial institutions are expected to:

i. understand, identify and assess their risks;

ii. take appropriate actions to mitigate those risks; and

iii. allocate their resources efficiently by focusing on higher risk areas.

Given its role as regulator, it is incumbent on the TTSEC to be familiar with the AML/CFT risks that may develop within the securities sector, and to ensure that measures to mitigate the attendant risks are implemented. In fulfilling this mandate, Figure 1 outlines the six (6) measures that have been employed by the TTSEC.

The registrant

What is a CO?

The CO is responsible, inter alia, for the implementation of the AML/CFT policies and practices within registrant firms and will be guided by the existing legislation in this regard. In carrying out their function, the main role of the CO is to ensure that the registrant is not exposed to criminal risk, and does not inadvertently or deliberately facilitate financial crime.

Regulation 3(1) of the Financial Obligations Regulations, 2010 (the FORs), stipulates that each financial institution must designate a manager, or official employed at managerial level as its CO. Regulation 4(2) of the FORs requires approval by the relevant supervisory authority of the CO designated by the financial institution/registrant. These requirements are also set out in Guidelines 6 and 7 of the Commission’s AML/CFT Guidelines for the Securities Sector , which was updated and amended in November, 2018. The guidelines also state that the CO of a financial institution; that is part of a financial group, may be designated as the CO for more than one of the financial institutions within the financial group, providing that the CO is employed within the financial group.

The TTSEC assesses each CO application and considers whether the person designated is fit and proper to function in the position of CO. As part of the assessment process, the TTSEC will additionally review :

I. The educational and professional experience of the CO.

II. Confirm that the CO is employed at a managerial level and can therefore effectively carry out their duties, which includes reporting to, and gaining support from, the Board (or equivalent executive body).

III. The reputation, character, reliability and financial integrity, of the CO.

The major responsibilities of the CO

The CO has the overall responsibility for the implementation of the Registrant’s AML/CFT compliance programme. At a minimum, the CO must perform the functions and duties as prescribed in Regulation 4(1) of the FORs and among other things should:

1. Have oversight of the AML/CFT control activity in all relevant business areas;

2. Ensure that the AML/CFT compliance programme is adequate in relation to the Registrant’s identified inherent risks, with consideration given to local and international developments;

3. Ensure that regular and proper risk assessments of the inherent ML and TF risks are carried out. This would include timely assessments of new products, services and client on boarding procedures in order to identify potential Money Laundering/Terrorism Financing (ML/TF) risks and develop appropriate control mechanisms;

4. Ensure that periodic assessments of AML/CFT control mechanisms are carried out, to confirm their continued relevance and effectiveness in addressing changing ML/TF risks. Continually assess operational changes, including the introduction of new technology and processes in order to ensure that ML/TF risks are addressed;

5. Ensure that system resources, including those required to identify and report suspicious transactions, are adequate and effective.

6. Ensure that AML/CFT policies and procedures are formalised, kept up to date and approved by the Board of Directors;

7. Ensure that ongoing AML/CFT training programmes are carried out for all new and existing employees, senior management and the Board of Directors and ensure that such AML/CFT training programmes are up-to-date and relevant to the Registrant’s business;

8. Ensure that systems and other processes that generate information used in reports to senior management are adequate and appropriate;

9. Report relevant information to the Board of Directors and/or senior management regarding the adequacy of the AML/CFT; and

10. Ensure that any changes to the AML/CFT compliance programme are disseminated to all employees and assist departments in the implementation of the AML/CFT compliance programme.

As we continue to explore the many facets of the AML/CFT compliance programme, we will focus on the Compliance Programme, Customer Due Diligence and Beneficial Owners in our next article in Express Business .

For more information on the securities industry visit us at or or follow us on Facebook; Twitter; Instagram and YouTube.


Lisa is a 25-year-old nail technician employed in Maraval.

Four weeks ago she was invited to invest $50 with the promise that she would get $14,400—an investment with just a four-week duration. The initial sum was small and the promise to get back thousands of dollars was attractive, so she decided to join.

She was recruited by a friend on Facebook. Lisa was then added to a group called “The Gifting” on the communications app Telegram.

According to the app, the group was created on October 31, and up to yesterday morning had 37 members.

ONE CARIBBEAN Media (OCM) chief executive Dawn Thomas yesterday blamed active market manipulation for the decline of the media-dominated conglomerate’s share price to $4.82 on Thursday. OCM’s share price closed at $4.80 yesterday, but it started 2020 at $8.50 per share.

THE Health Ministry has advised of a recall in the United States of the Tanimura & Antle brand of packaged single-head romaine lettuce, due to possible E coli bacteria contamination.

As a result, the ministry said yesterday that until it provides clearance, supermarkets, restaurants and wholesalers should not offer the product for sale.

E coli 0157:H7 may cause diarrhoeal illness.

As such, if people are experiencing diarrhoea, vomiting, fever, abdominal pain or bloody stools after consumption of the lettuce, they should contact their nearest health institution, the ministry said.

A Venezuelan worker was paid $50 a day to work in a farm in South Trinidad from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m.

One family was forced to leave their seven-year-old child to look after his siblings aged six and four, so that the parents could go out to work.

BPTT says it intends to continue its tenancy of Queen’s Park Plaza and the adjoining Albion Plaza at Queen’s Park West.

The issue of bpTT changing its tenancy arrangements at the building arose early last week as the company confirned it was in the final stages of an involuntary separation exercise aimed at reducing its 800-strong workforce. The severance exercise followed an earlier round of voluntary separations.