Attorneys are demanding that National Security Minister Stuart Young immediately remove his “arbitrary, illegal and unlawful poli­cy regarding entry to citizens into their beloved homeland, Trinidad and Tobago”.

The demand is made in a legal letter to Young and co­pied to Health Mini­ster Terrence Deyal­singh on behalf of 74-year-old pensioner Radhikar Ramoutar, who has been stranded in Canada since March 2020.

“It is anathema to our identity as a sovereign democratic state, and should the regulation not be expunged and the air and sea ports be made accessible to our client, we intend to file judicial review proceedings to declare your actions as arbitrary, unlawful and/or in breach of her constitutional rights. We propose to further seek the appropriate relief thereby compelling you to act lawfully,” the letter said.

The attorneys requested that Young respond to the letter by noon on Friday. In the letter, the attorneys argued that because of Young’s “unlawful” decision to close all air and sea ports, Ramoutar has been “virtually exiled” from her home country.

They said she has suffered tremendously and was even hospital­ised in Canada because of high blood pressure.

Her pension in T&T has been discontinued as she is not able to present herself to prove she is alive, her attorneys said.

Attorney Rhea Khan of Fortis Chambers issued the legal letter dated January 18 to Young, advi­sing that she and attorneys Dinesh Rambally, Kiel Taklalsingh and Stefan Ramkissoon act on behalf of Ramoutar and intend to file judicial review proceedings to declare his actions as arbitrary, unlawful and/or in breach of Ramoutar’s constitutional rights.

The letter detailed the pain, suffering and anguish Ramoutar has endured, having been locked out of her homeland.

It said that on February 21, 2020, Ramoutar visited Canada to console and assist her daughter who lives in Canada and whose husband had recently died.

The attorneys said Ramoutar planned to stay for two weeks and would have taken sufficient medication and finances to sustain her for that period only.

They argued that the unforeseen extension of her stay, precipitated by Young’s “unlawful actions”, has now deprived her of the medi­cal services which she enjoys and is entitled to at home in T&T.

They said Ramoutar benefits from medical treatment and management for cardiac issues after the installation of her pacemaker.

It added she was also receiving medical treatment for arthritis and knee issues which were being effectively managed here in T&T.

Unlawful conduct

The attorneys said Ramoutar tried unsuccessfully to seek help from the High Commission in Canada and an airline to return home.

They said that on July 7, 2020, Ramoutar applied for an exemption and her efforts have proven futile.

Having been unable to return home, her lawyers said she has suffered hardship because of Young’s “unlawful conduct” and has incurred medical expenses in Canada to the tune of some Can$7,000 ($39,900).

“On one occasion, due to the stress and anguish of her situation, directly attributable to your unlawful decision, she underwent hospitalisation because of dangerously elevated blood pressure. Further, due to her prolonged exposure to the cold weather in Canada, her arthritis condition has been exacer­bated and she now suffers from crippling body pains,” said the letter.

“Our client lives in unbearable agony and is materially confined to a single room all day. She has become totally dependent on her daughter and other persons for her daily needs and basic necessities.

“To add insult to injury, her pension benefits in Trinidad and Tobago have been discontinued and/or suspended. Upon her son making enquiries of the National Insurance Board, she has been informed that she must present herself to the relevant office in order to show “proof of life”, the letter added.

‘Directly repugnant’

The attorneys said regulations to close all air and sea ports are unconstitutional and also unlawful and/or ultra vires the Public Health Ordinance and the Immigration Act.

The attorneys said they accept that Section 105 of the Public Health Ordinance gives Young wide powers to combat Covid-19, but argued that the closure of ports of entry is not such a power.

They argued further that Young cannot lawfully use regulations, which is subsidiary legislation crea­ted by the executive, to amend, un­dermine or alter substantive benefits conferred to and/or enjoyed by Ramoutar and other citizens by primary legislation and/or the Constitution.

Ramoutar’s rights as enshrined in the Constitution and Immigration Act are being infringed, her attorneys contended.

They said Young has no statutory power and/or legal authority to create a regulation to close all air and sea ports, which prevents Ramoutar and other citizens from returning home.

They added further that the use of these regulations, without parliamen­tary scrutiny to limit the fun­da­men­tal rights and freedoms of the society, is “directly repugnant” to so­ciety’s constitutional norms and values.