David Jessop

David Jessop

A FEW days ago, the Caribbean Tourism Organisation (CTO) announced that it is to restructure its operations to “elevate tourism development in the region”.

Its chairman, the Minister of Tourism of St Lucia, Dominic Fedee, said that CTO would be closing its London and New York offices by the end of January 2020 and would undertake a comprehensive audit of the role of its head office in Barbados; a process that could well involve further redundancies.

The restructuring is expected to significantly reduce CTO’s operational expenditure. It is a change that is much needed.

In an e-mailed statement, Mr Fedee said the CTO would have to reinvent and reposition itself “as a pillar upon which tourism advancement can rest”. This he suggested would require CTO to refocus on marketing the Caribbean as a single brand, and on tourism as a tool for sustainable development.

CTO has a role that is unusual, mixing politics, policy development, functional objectives from statistics collection and analysis, to activities that cross over with those of the private sector.

It has previously done good work on marketing, made strenuous efforts in Washington lobbying Congress and multilateral institutions, succeeded in its activities in London on the UK’s Air Passenger Duty, engaged with the European Commission, and been involved in a positive way with many other initiatives including at times industry-critical dialogue with external commercial partners.

However, all institutions need to adapt and refocus. CTO’s proposed restructuring offers the opportunity for Caribbean governments and the industry to consider what they want delivered by tourism’s various component entities and how at a policy level an effective, stronger, co-ordinated voice might be achieved on key issues.

The announcement comes at a time when there is a growing understanding of the broader role the sector might play in Caribbean social and economic development, and just as international financial institutions and development partners such as the European Union are prepared to support responses involving sectoral initiatives.

While CTO is an institution of Caricom, many find it inexplicable that Caribbean Heads appear to dedicate so little time to discussing the state of Caribbean tourism or its potential to drive growth and change. This suggests that there is much more to be done jointly by Tourism ministers to move forward the sector’s priority policy concerns.

As CTO rationalises its core objectives, it has a unique opportunity to strengthen its role as the political voice of the industry that that creates on average 40 per cent of the Caribbean’s GDP, earned the region US$62 billion in 2018, employs about one in 11 of the region’s citizens, and has the capacity to transfer to the region a significant part of the disposable income of travellers from more economically advanced nations.

As recent developments indicate, the industry is not short of problems that require joined up solutions whether they relate to the high cost of energy, security, airlift or sargassum.

Statistics suggest that despite the Caribbean continuing to experience buoyant visitor arrivals numbers, the industry in the region may not this year experience a commensurate overall rise in earnings, and could begin to suffer if as some international financial institutions forecast, changing US trade policy results in a global economic slowdown.

According to the industry analysts STR (formerly Smith Travel Research) this year Caribbean hotels have experienced a decline in revenue per available room (RevPAR), a key industry measure of profitability, and a fall in occupancy rates, possibly signalling longer-term economic problems.

STR said that while hoteliers continued to increase the average daily rate (ADR) charged, this was not enough to drive RevPAR and thus profitability upwards. It forecast that 2019 will end with a 1.1 per cent increase in ADR and a 0.3 per cent rise in RevPAR over 2018, but a slight decrease in hotel occupancy of minus 0.8 per cent.

This is the type of data which CTO needs to do more to develop and apply to regional tourism policy if weaknesses are to be addressed and tourism is to become a sustainable force for economic development.

A revitalised CTO could also support a serious debate about future growth: one that does not avoid difficult questions relating to longer term strategies on cruise tourism, aviation taxation, chain hotels, changing consumer requirements and who pays and benefits from the cost of marketing.

Well considered, change in in CTO could be a force for regional good, especially if its research and future actions encourage all Caribbean ministers and prime ministers to respond more positively when tourism touches their portfolio.

David Jessop is a

consultant to the Caribbean Council and can be contacted at:

david.jessop@caribbean-council.org

Sophia Chote’s column

returns next Sunday

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

Based on the recently passed Miscellaneous Provisions (Law Enforcement Officers) Bill, a report headlined “Don’t bribe law enforcement officers” appeared in the Express on Tuesday.

AS the Internet exploded exponentially in the late 1990s, so did social media in the next decade and beyond. As soon as its marketing potential to build brands and to solidify well-earned reputations was recognised and utilised, so did the downside rear its ugly head.

ON Friday last week, Canadian banking took a big jump out of the Caribbean. CIBC—Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce—announced the sale of just over two-thirds of its First Caribbean International Bank to a company controlled by Colombian billionaire Jaime Gilinski for close to US$800 million.

I have been a passenger of the water taxi service since its inception. The purpose of this letter is to draw your attention to one of the vessels.

Following the debate in the Upper House, one would believe some of the members do not live in T&T and appreciate the seriousness of the state of crime in the land.

The incumbent Mayor of Chaguanas recently announced his decision not to seek reappointment to that office. This follows announcements of two other sitting UNC parliamentarians who have decided to “call it a day”.