David Jessop

David Jessop

Speaking recently in New York, the state governor, Andrew Cuomo, said: “The stress, the emotion, is just incredible, and rightfully so. It is a situation that is one of the most disruptive that I have seen, and it will change almost everything going forward. It will. That is a fact. It’s not your perception. It’s not just you. It’s all of us and it’s true and it’s real. Nobody can tell you when this is going to end... It will change almost everything.”

At almost the other end of the political spectrum, Cuba’s deputy prime minister and minister of economy and planning, Alejandro Gil said: “We are exposed, like the rest of the world, to an unforeseeable scenario to which we must respond with an organised strategy, not with improvisation….There may be a lasting scenario and we have to prepare for it; look for solutions with the lowest economic cost and be able to recover as soon as possible.”

In a similar vein, Leo Varadkar, Ireland’s prime minister, said on St Patrick’s Day that he would always put the Irish people’s “life and your health ahead of any other concern”, and made clear he did not know when the crisis would end. In a similar vein Jacinta Ardern, New Zealand’s prime minister, demonstrated again her proven humanity by informally answering from her home, after putting her daughter to bed, citizens’ calls on Facebook Live.

All deserve respect and trust and inspire hope through their willingness to be honest and ability to empathise.

Unlike some of their counterparts elsewhere in the world they exhibit competence and have been apolitical about the true short- and long-term human and economic implications.

In the Anglophone Caribbean and the Dominican Republic the style may be different, but the ability to cut through and demonstrate leadership has also been evident in countries where governments have recognised the irrelevance of ideology and tribalism when it comes to the need to secure public health and act to help the most vulnerable in society.

In an indication of the task facing the region, Barbados’ PM, Mia Mottley, recently told her country’s Parliament that recovery will be challenging.

Announcing a US$10 million “survival” package in response to the significant loss in revenue from tourism and increased expenditure as a result of COVID-19, she said Barbados was back at the point in 2019 when her government started its IMF recovery programme. Although able to announce having achieved a remarkable economic turnaround in 2019-20 with a primary surplus of 5.7 per cent or US$298.7 million, Ms Mottley, observed that for her there was “no glory in hitting targets and people are suffering”. Instead of the 1.5 per cent growth her government had hoped for in 2020-2021, “we have gone back to the start line”, she said.

Her presentation indicated the problems the island and the region’s other tourism dependent economies may face. If the most severe scenario of an 80 per cent reduction in visitor arrivals comes to pass, which in Barbados’ case she said “it is looking more and more like”, all regional economic forecasting will require significant revision.

It will also need the region’s leaders to simultaneously find ways to stimulate growth to respond to budget deficits while coping with the absence of tourism revenues, a fall-off in remittances, a probable limit on the amount of external support available, low oil prices, high food import bills, weak consumer demand, and a global recession.

When it comes to this crisis, a visitor-led post-pandemic recovery may be more complex than it seems. This is because the required responses go far beyond the issues that tourism professionals and governments normally consider, requiring above all both “send and receive” markets to be aligned in relation to public health.

One of the greatest but so far little spoken about problems, in the absence of either a vaccine and/or some form of reliable health certification for every visitor, is that the virus could asymptomatically be imported into the region from countries that have not done enough, have failed to deliver an efficient response, or are simply in denial.

Visitor-receiving states will then find themselves in the invidious position of taking decisions on which states have done all that is necessary to restore public health and then in all likelihood having to agree bilaterally with the country concerned the basis on which visitors from those nations can travel.

Without a vaccine, such an eventuality will remain politically and electorally sensitive for several years and have xenophobic implications. It will also impact on the frequency of air and sea lift, foreign relations, public health policy, taxation, food security, insurance provisions, and much else, well before the marketing specialists are able to begin addressing consumer perception and willingness to travel.

To note this is not to be alarmist but to indicate the huge complexity of resuscitating tourism and by extension the Caribbean economy should a satisfactory vaccine not appear soon. It is also to indicate the importance of decisive leadership and a well-planned and enunciated economic exit strategy once the immediate health crisis has passed.

Recovery will require new thinking and leadership. It will need governments, opposition parties, industry and social partners to have a shared vision as to how to balance the urgent need to rebuild economies and generate employment, while ensuring a genuine consensus and ensuing that all necessary precautions remain in place.

The coming weeks will demonstrate which Caribbean leaders can guide their people safely out of the public health crisis and explain with empathy and honesty exactly what will be involved in creating national and then regional social and economic recovery in a likely much changed post-coronavirus world.


World Environment Day 2020 arrives with the news that notwithstanding the dramatic Covid-19-induced reduction in carbon emissions, the level of carbon dioxide in the air is at its highest in recorded history.

Let me restate my point of view that genuine recovery depends on a few key things: 1. Managing the Survival Phase; 2. Restoring Closed Businesses; 3. Recoup and Retrieval for Businesses as they open; 4. A National Recovery Strategy; 5. Immediate Action of Economic Restructuring, 6. Building a New Economy post Covid.

As T&T’s most prominent columnist, I often get bombarded with questions from fans wanting expert advice on complicated subject matters. For example, Kathy, who works at Scotiabank Credit Card Centre, writes: “Dear Darryn, your failure to reply leaves us with no choice but to commence legal proceedings.”

“Every politician who has tasted power, and many who counted for little, has gone to war with the media. If they didn’t, that would signal that journalists were not doing their jobs, that they were too busy prostrating to power to do their duty to country.”

Here in sweet T&T, we have jumped on the US bandwagon and have stood up and expressed our diverse views on the ongoing racial tension in the US, but I ask us to step back and look at our country.

It’s been a bad week in the United States: six nights of protests, huge anger, rioting and looting in 50 cities, hundreds arrested or injured—but only six dead over the police murder of George Floyd. The number may have gone up by the time you read this, but it’s definitely not 1968 again.