Express Editorial : Daily

Election campaigns are notorious for a heightening of race talk in Trinidad and Tobago. This has been the reality since before Independence and, despite changing demographics, remains an element of the politics. The emergence of social media as a forum for individual expression has removed filters which once protected the society from extreme language including publicly racist language. In such a context, it is difficult to determine whether T&T is becoming more polarised on the basis of race, as some believe, or whether social media is magnifying and manipulating whatever pockets of polarisation exist.

This issue has acquired some currency with the recent Express poll conducted by Solution by Simulation which found the society divided along racial lines on key national issues, with those of “African descent” being more supportive of government policy than those of “Indian descent”.

On the opinion of citizens of mixed ethnicity, the poll stated that “it typically lies between that of the two major ethnic groups, although mixed persons tend to side more with Indos on distrust of the national institutions and rejection of government policy, with the exception of economic policies and the overall assessment of the government in which their views are more akin to persons of African descent.”

However, as polarising a scenario as the African/Indian figures suggest, another element of T&T’s political reality is the longing to escape race politics which goes all the way back to the Trinidad Labour Party of the 1930s, the Party of Political Progress Groups (POPPG) known as the business party, and the whole stream of non-ethnic parties which eventually coalesced into the political tsunami of the National Alliance for Reconstruction of 1986 which, for a few brief moments seemed to sweep aside the politics of race.

In many different ways and with varying degrees of success, the population has since continued to demonstrate an abiding interest in moving T&T’s politics beyond race. Today, even in the midst of anxiety about racial polarisation, there is a flourishing of political options not based on racial solidarity. There are parties pitching to workers, to the youth, to the environment, to better governance and so on. Each believes there is a constituency for what it has to offer.

Even the two political parties in Parliament that have historically drawn their support from the two main race groups would know that pitching to race is not enough to win an election in 21st century Trinidad and Tobago.

Between them is a substantial body of voters who have been willing to switch from one to the other, putting them into office and removing them almost at will. For these voters who have been determining the outcome of elections since 1986, race is not the primary factor. These are political facts that should be borne in mind whenever the volume of race talk is raised. Recognising the political pattern of public discourse during election seasons also helps to provide some perspective on an issue that has torn apart many other societies even as T&T manages to amble its way in negotiating the contentious issue of race.

Having said that, however, the precious yet delicate fabric of Trinidad and Tobago society should never be taken for granted. It is the responsibility of all, and especially of those aspiring to lead this country, to set their faces against division, whether of race, class, religion or creed. Trinidad and Tobago needs all its people to achieve its fullest potential.


THE Ministry of Labour and Small Enterprise Development recently rolled out the first series of a roadshow entitled “Maternity Matters at Work”.

ONCE AGAIN, Trinidad Carnival has ploughed through multiple convulsions of anxiety to make it safely onto the road.

Reparations for native genocide and enslavement of continental Africans are raised in the Americas and Africa by descendants of native peoples and by descendants of enslaved Africans, and their surviving generational lines of relatives in Africa. Reparations are being sought against native genocide, the wholesale theft of enslaved labour power and suppression of the self volition of Continental Africans, from 1501 – 1865 and beyond.

The hostility expressed by some people on social media and YouTube to “Welcome to Chinatown” by Singing Sonia can be best described as twisted irony or perhaps someone can explain the difference between picong and racism as far as calypso is concerned.

ONE would have hoped that Justice Vasheist Kokaram’s quite thoughtful judgment would have encouraged the Prime Minister to abandon his politically aggressive attitude and apply some statesmanship in dealing with the Law Association’s case for impeaching the Chief Justice.