It is very unfortunate, but there seems to be developing a repeat of the Tobago/Sandals situation with the proposed construction of the Toco port.

A small group of experts and persons who have demonstrated no interest in the development of the Toco area for the last 25 years are now identifying numerous reasons why the port should not be built.

A few months ago, at the first consultation on the construction of the Toco port, which was held at a venue with dozens of persons outside of the hall, I did not identify any “local residents” who indicated the people of the area were against this major development.

There were some probing questions, while many suggestions were also made in relation to how the project could be advanced with greater awareness of the local residents.

The few dissenting voices were mainly from a couple absentee holiday-home owners and a journalist.

Over 20 years ago, the first attempt to construct a port at Toco was blocked by the involvement and leadership of persons from Port of Spain and a few prominent local persons. The development was badly handled by the administration at the time, specifically the uncertainty associated with the scale of the project and resettlement issues.

Politics also played “ole mas” with policy, as the opposition of the day opposed the construction of the port.

This time around, the attacks against the project are coming almost exclusively from persons (experts) from outside of the community.

At the first consultation, I reminded the gathering the people of Toco needed to be careful of a repeat of the situation which unfolded in Tobago.

There are prominent persons who were born in Toco but, due to various challenges, are unable to lend their voices to support this significant project for the transformation of the area. I respect their positions: some are young professionals while others are considering business options.

All developmental projects would have advantages and disadvantages, and the Toco port is no exception, but the “experts” only advanced negative impacts of the project, while an objective assessment of the social and economic advancement of the community is disregarded.

There is a false narrative that the residents of the area do not want this type of development. However, an independent survey of the residents of the Toco area would confirm the overwhelming support for this project.

Just recently, as a freelance journalist, I wrote some articles about Carnival, but changed my mind about submitting them to a newspaper after I became disappointed with the management of this year’s edition of the festival.

However, I was forced to say something about the Toco port situation, when I recently saw a very aggressive article in one of the Sunday newspapers condemning the project, without seriously analysing the position of the residents.

If my voice is considered as a voice crying in the wilderness, let it be so written...

Andre McEachnie

Sans Souci, Toco


THE Ministry of Labour and Small Enterprise Development recently rolled out the first series of a roadshow entitled “Maternity Matters at Work”.

ONCE AGAIN, Trinidad Carnival has ploughed through multiple convulsions of anxiety to make it safely onto the road.

Reparations for native genocide and enslavement of continental Africans are raised in the Americas and Africa by descendants of native peoples and by descendants of enslaved Africans, and their surviving generational lines of relatives in Africa. Reparations are being sought against native genocide, the wholesale theft of enslaved labour power and suppression of the self volition of Continental Africans, from 1501 – 1865 and beyond.

The hostility expressed by some people on social media and YouTube to “Welcome to Chinatown” by Singing Sonia can be best described as twisted irony or perhaps someone can explain the difference between picong and racism as far as calypso is concerned.

ONE would have hoped that Justice Vasheist Kokaram’s quite thoughtful judgment would have encouraged the Prime Minister to abandon his politically aggressive attitude and apply some statesmanship in dealing with the Law Association’s case for impeaching the Chief Justice.